Overview of Metal Wires
This brief overview introduces metal wire feedstock for Directed Energy Deposition (DED), including Wire‑Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) and laser wire deposition. Compared with powders, wire typically offers near‑100% material utilisation, high deposition rates, clean handling, and simpler logistics—attributes that make it an essential AM feedstock today. In WAAM, deposition rates commonly span ~1–10 kg/h; in laser wire DED, rates around ≤5 kg/h are typical depending on alloy and deposition head design.
Use the Search function above to find details about specific alloys, or jump via the Table of Common Alloys below.
Advancements in Laser Wire-Feed Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Brief Review – PMC
How metal alloy wire is produced (for AM)
Metal alloy wire for DED is generally manufactured by casting and hot‑working to rod, followed by multi‑pass drawing to the final diameter with intermediate anneals. After drawing, wire is surface‑conditioned (e.g., shaved/cleaned), optionally copper‑coated for stable feeding and current transfer (common for steels), lubricated, and precision layer‑wound onto spools or bulk drums to control helix and feeding behaviour. Suppliers emphasise consistent cleanliness and lubrication for long WAAM builds, and offer bulk packaging to enable uninterrupted deposition.
Typical packaging: BS/D300 spools (≈15 kg), K300/BS300 variants, and bulk drums/boxes from ~110–450 kg to extend arc‑on time in production cells.
Laser wire heads (e.g., coaxial multi‑beam designs) commonly process 0.8–1.6 mm wire across steels, Ni, Ti, Cu, Co; advanced heads support ≤5 kg/h with direction‑independent feeding. For fine, filigree features, research demonstrators process 0.2–0.6 mm wire.
WAAM + LW-DED Common Wire Alloys
| Wrought Form | UNS + EN ISO Designation | Major Alloying Elements |
|---|---|---|
| 316L (Stainless Steel) | UNS S31603; EN ISO 14343-A: W 19 12 3 L | Cr, Ni, Mo |
| 304L / 308L | UNS S30880; EN ISO 14343-A: W 19 9 L | Cr, Ni |
| 309L | UNS S30983; EN ISO 14343-A: W 23 12 L | Cr, Ni |
| 310 | UNS S31000; EN ISO 14343-A: W 25 20 | Cr, Ni |
| 312 | UNS S31200; EN ISO 14343-A: W 29 9 | Cr, Ni |
| 317L | UNS S31703; EN ISO 14343-A: W 18 15 3 L | Cr, Ni, Mo |
| 347 | UNS S34780; EN ISO 14343-A: W 19 9 Nb | Cr, Ni, Nb |
| 904L | UNS N08904; EN ISO 14343-A: W 20 25 5 Cu L | Cr, Ni, Mo, Cu |
| Duplex 2205 | UNS S32205 / S31803; EN ISO 14343-A: W 22 9 3 N L | Cr, Ni, Mo, N |
| 17-4PH (PH Stainless) | UNS S17400; EN ISO: SS630 | Cr, Ni, Cu |
| FV520 (PH Stainless) | UNS S45000; EN ISO: N/A | Cr, Ni, Mo |
| S420 / S460 / S690 (Structural Steels) | EN ISO 14341-A: G 42–69 4 M G3Si1 | C, Mn |
| 6061 | UNS A96061; EN ISO 18273: S Al 4045 | Al, Mg, Si |
| AlSi7Mg | UNS A94018; EN ISO 18273: S Al 4018 | Al, Si, Mg |
| AlSi10Mg | UNS A94046; EN ISO 18273: S Al 4046 | Al, Si, Mg |
| AlMg5Cr | UNS A95356; EN ISO 18273: S Al 5356 | Al, Mg, Cr |
| AlMg4.5Mn | UNS A95183; EN ISO 18273: S Al 5183 | Al, Mg, Mn |
| AlCu6MnZrTi | UNS A92319; EN ISO 18273: S Al 2319 | Al, Cu |
| Ti-6Al-4V (Ti64) | UNS R56400; EN ISO 24034: W Ti 6Al 4V | Ti, Al, V |
| CP Ti Grade 2 | UNS R50400; EN ISO 24034: W Ti 2 | Ti |
| CP Ti Grade 4 | UNS R50700; EN ISO 24034: W Ti 4 | Ti |
| IN625 (Nickel Alloy) | UNS N06625; EN ISO 18274: S Ni 6625 | Ni, Cr, Mo |
| IN718 (Nickel Alloy) | UNS N07718; EN ISO 18274: S Ni 7718 | Ni, Cr, Nb |
| Invar 36 | UNS K93600; EN ISO 18274: S Ni 4036 | Ni, Fe |
| Stellite 6 (Cobalt Alloy) | UNS R30006; EN ISO 24373: S CoCr-A | Co, Cr, W, C |
| Pure Copper | UNS C11000; EN ISO 24373: S Cu 1897 | Cu |
| CuCr1Zr | UNS C18150; EN ISO 24373: S Cu 1898 | Cu, Cr, Zr |
| CuSn6 (Bronze) | UNS C51900; EN ISO 24373: S Cu 5180 | Cu, Sn |
| CuNi3SiMg | UNS C70250; EN ISO 24373: S Cu 7025 | Cu, Ni, Si, Mg |
| H13 Tool Steel | UNS T20813; EN ISO 16834-A: G MoCr | Fe, Cr, Mo, V |
| M2 Tool Steel | UNS T11302; EN ISO 16834-A: G MoWV | Fe, Mo, W, V |
| Tungsten | UNS R07005; N/A | W |
| Molybdenum | UNS R03600; N/A | Mo |
| Tantalum | UNS R05200; N/A | Ta |
| Titanium Aluminides | N/A; Custom EN ISO wires | Ti, Al |
| Metal Matrix Composites (e.g., Ti + SiC) | N/A | Ti, SiC |
| Cobalt-Chromium Alloys (Medical Grade) | UNS R30075; EN ISO 24373: S CoCr-C | Co, Cr |
Properties of Metal Alloy Wires
Metal AM results depend strongly on wire diameter, cast/helix, surface condition, and chemistry. For DED, the most common solid wire diameters are:
- Arc processes (GMAW/TIG/PTA WAAM): 0.8–1.6 mm for MIG/MAG; up to 2.4–4.0 mm is also used for TIG/plasma on large titanium and steels (wire size influences melt efficiency and bead shape).
- Laser wire DED/cladding: typically 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.6 mm; fine heads support 0.2–0.6 mm for small features.
Representative property table (wire):
| Property | Typical values / notes |
|---|---|
| Wire diameter | 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.6 mm (common); special: 2.0–4.0 mm (TIG/PTA WAAM); fine laser wire 0.2–0.6 mm. |
| Packaging | D300/BS300 ~15 kg spools; bulk drums/boxes 100–450 kg for production. |
| Surface | Copper‑coated (e.g., mild steel ER70S‑6) or bright/bare (stainless/Ni/Ti) depending on alloy and process. |
| Dimensional tolerance / cast & helix | Supplier‑controlled to AWS A5.02 and ISO 544 where applicable. |
Controlling diameter, chemistry, cast/helix, and surface is critical for repeatable feeding, stable transfer, and bead geometry—especially during long, multi‑hour WAAM builds. Suppliers of WAAM‑oriented wires explicitly manage cleaning and lubrication uniformity for this reason.
Specifications of Metal Alloy Wires
Wires for AM follow established welding filler standards for classification, chemistry, sizes, and testing. The following are most relevant in WAAM/laser wire DED:
| Parameter | Typical standard(s) |
|---|---|
| Shielding gases | ISO 14175 (process‑dependent) |
| Wire sizes & tolerances | ISO 544 (sizes/tolerances) where referenced by suppliers |
Alloy‑specific supplements often add requirements (e.g., hydrogen/oxygen control for Ti wire) and list mandatory test methods; always consult the specific supplier’s own alloy’s data sheet.
Supplier snapshot (today’s WAAM / laser‑DED wire sources)
Welding Alloys – flux‑cored GAMMA 625 for Ni‑625 cladding/structures (option for DED‑arc where cored wires are acceptable).
voestalpine Böhler Welding – dedicated WAAM wire portfolio across unalloyed, stainless, nickel, cobalt and Ti (e.g., 3Dprint AM Cryo 316L, 410NiMo, Cu 6327, Ti‑2).
ESAB / Exaton – stainless & nickel wires (e.g., ER70S‑6, ER316LSi), with Marathon Pac bulk drums and broad GMAW ranges for automation.
Lincoln Electric – carbon steel (SuperArc ER70S‑x series), stainless (Red Max), and nickel (Techalloy 625), with Accu‑Pak/Accu‑Trak drums from 100 450 kg for long WAAM runs.
Deutsche Nickel – AM‑labelled wires for 625 & 718 (DN‑625 AM, DN‑718 AM) and a broad nickel consumables range; sizes 0.6–3.2 mm and spools/drums.
VDM Metals – nickel & high‑alloy welding consumables (wires/rods/strips) with narrow chemistry dimension tolerances and barrels/drums for automated welding/AM.
Selectarc – WAAM‑oriented portfolio covering stainless, low‑alloy, aluminium, nickel, copper, titanium; brochure and technical data sheets for AM projects.
Frequently Asked Questions
1) What wire diameters should I pick for WAAM or laser wire?
WAAM: 0.8–1.6 mm for MIG/MAG; thicker (2.4–4.0 mm) is viable with TIG/plasma, especially on Ti‑6Al‑4V. Wire size affects melting efficiency and bead shape.
Laser wire: 0.8–1.6 mm is mainstream on industrial heads; fine features can go 0.2–0.6 mm with specialised optics.
2) What deposition rates are realistic?
WAAM (arc): ~1–10+ kg/h depending on source and material.
Laser wire: ≤5 kg/h reported for steels using high‑power coaxial heads.
3) Can I use flux‑cored wire?
Yes—applications like Ni‑625 cladding use flux‑cored wires to improve arc stability and wetting. Evaluate slag/cleanup impact on your workflow.
4) Why bulk drums instead of small spools?
Bulk drums (~100– 450 kg) minimise changeovers and stabilise feeding for long robotic builds; ESAB’s Marathon Pac and Lincoln’s Accu‑Pak/Accu‑Trak are common options.
5) Any cost considerations vs powder?
Wire delivers near‑100% material utilisation, simpler handling, and often lower feedstock cost per kilogram at volume. WAAM’s ability to replace forgings/castings can reduce lead time and cost; laser wire systems stress the 100% utilisation and clean operation benefits.
Cost of Metal Alloy Wires
When metal additive manufacturing first gained traction, feedstock costs were a major concern—especially for powders. Wire, however, offers a different economic profile. Because wire feedstock achieves near‑100% material utilisation, there is virtually no waste, unlike powder processes where unused material must be recovered and potentially requalified.
Key cost advantages of wire over powder:
- Lower processing overhead: Wire production involves drawing and surface finishing, whereas powder requires atomisation, sieving, and handling under strict conditions.
- Simpler logistics: Wire is supplied on 15 kg spools or bulk drums (110–450 kg), reducing handling and storage complexity (ESAB Marathon Pac, Lincoln Accu‑Pak).
- Reduced contamination risk: No powder recovery or recycling steps, which lowers operational costs and improves safety.
Price trends:
Wire pricing is generally closer to conventional welding consumables than to AM powders. For common steels (e.g., ER70S‑6), wire costs can be several times lower per kilogram than equivalent powder grades. For high‑value alloys (e.g., nickel or titanium), wire still commands a premium over bulk bar stock but remains significantly cheaper than powder due to fewer processing steps (voestalpine Böhler Welding, VDM Metals).
Bottom line:
As WAAM and laser wire DED scale up, wire feedstock is increasingly viewed as an industrial commodity, and pricing is expected to stabilise further. Combined with high deposition rates and near‑zero waste, wire economics are a strong driver for large‑format AM adoption.




